however, is merely surmise on my part and may be
disproved by further investigation.
8.
}
98
The warning was communicated by the Hongkong
police to the Commodore in longkong and I presume
also to the shipping companies. I have not been
informed what special precautions were taken by the
Eritish naval authorities or 3, the companies, but
the officers of the ill fated vessel were apparently
taken completely by surprise. No mention is made in
the press report of any measures for the protection
of the bridge, and the officers' arms, as in all
these piracy cases, were left in the cabins, a pre-
sent for the first pirate gang to take the ship.
I would refer you to my despatch No.2 of the 16th
January 1928 for my own views as to the essential
precaution to be taken by the shipping companies
for the internal defence of their ships, namely a
fortified bridge. But as this does not seem to we
practicable on account of the expense involved,
the only remaining remedy would appear to be to
supply these vessels with armed guards to be furnish-
ed by the British garrisons in Hongkong, China and
the Straits Settlements. I enclose a copy of a
letter from Mr. N. S. Brown, the General Manager
of Messrs. Butterfield & Swire, submitting this
proposal, which I have the honour to recommend for
your favourable consideration.
I have etc.,
(Signed)
J. F. BRENAN.
Acting Consul-General.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.